Big mouth strikes again.
I enjoy writing articles and publish them here, mainly about the internet and the trends and issues I think are interesting or important. The views I express are are entirely my own and do not represent those of my employers or companies I associate with.
August 27th, 2008 ·

More and more I wonder why apple chose to not ship the iPhone safari with a flash player support, seems crazy to me considering the multimedia capabilities of the phone and the fact a LOT of websites depend on it (I couldn’t access the lego online shop on my iPhone recently) . One excuse I heard from Apple is that the touch interface would not work with most Flash media but I don’t buy this. Steve Jobs
has been critical of Flash for the iPhone in the past, suggesting that the mobile version of Flash isn’t powerful enough for the iPhone, and that the Mac version is too bloated for mobile gadgets - I don’t buy this either…Nokia have a version of the Flash player running on their handsets fine. From the Adobe camp we hear “We have a version that’s working on the emulation. This is still on the computer and you know, we have to continue to move it from a test environment onto the device and continue to make it work. So we are pleased with the internal progress that we’ve made to date.” This is bollocks too…mainly because this should have been sorted out a long time ago before even the 3G shipped. On top of this and to my amusement I saw on the BBC today a
story about how Apple’s latest iPhone ad is misleading because it does not offer ‘The full Internet” on the phone, the ASA has received complaints from consumers claiming that lack of support for Flash and Java means that not all parts of the internet are available on the iPhone. Well if the rumours and press statements are correct we can expect a Flash player for the iPhone soon, but I am not so confident due to Steve Jobs arrogance and bad relationship with Adobe. Shame because this would improve the iPhone browsing experience considerably for us (the people who pay handsomely for the device and app content), maybe another recent example of Apple not caring too much about their customers and product quality?
Categories: Home · Opinion · Working
June 5th, 2008 ·
Hype over
Now all the hype is (mostly) over I find myself along with a great many entrepreneurs, founders and investors are wondering what happens next. Clearly we have witnessed something important over the last 5 years a democratising shift on the web bringing a wealth of new technical innovations, standards and interoperability and a change in user behavior online that is driving the growth in social networks - something significant has happened, a tipping point or whatever you may want to call it. As O’Reilly the self proclaimed ‘inventor’ of web 2.0 pretentiously puts it “Web 2.0 is a transformative force that’s propelling companies across all industries towards a new way of doing business characterized by harnessing collective intelligence, openness, and network effects.” I agree to this statement, however this vision is currently a technical one and doesn’t really address the reality of building a real business on these principles and actually making money. Most of the companies who are driving web 2.0 (apart from the Yahoo’s and Google’s who make money from advertising) are still struggling to monetise the phenomena in a sustainable, long-term way, instead chasing short-term key performance indicators in the hope of a successful exit. I am hoping that the arm waving web 2.0 evangelists and conferences organisers start to take this into account and start to apply their thought leadership to the challenge of monetising web 2.0 and building sustainable businesses from it.
Investors losing confidence
The over hyped darlings of web 2.0 are still riding the wave of angel/VC funding gained from early market moves and with audience numbers growing - and are looking at a future of being bought out by Microhoo or whoever. This conveniently steers away from the business model problem but also means that web 2.0 companies don’t have to get creative and find a real business strategy - thus the danger is web 2.0 is becoming a fluffy add-on for traditional ‘business as usual’ (advertising/subscription/commission) web sites and is not redefining or transforming anything from a business model perspective. This is a real shame as the potential to test/iterate/improve any kind of models on the web is possible. There is evidence (and I have first hand experience) that many investors are losing faith in the web 2.0 phenomena, after 5 years of experimentation and ongoing investment there has been little to show in terms of real returns. Investors see the only real opportunity to realise any cash is to jump on the already successful 2.0 players…consolidation is coming (just like last time) and the big guys will get bigger and the smaller underdogs will sadly disappear. FT.com have an interesting article on this, claiming that this coupled with the coming economic downturn will help to dampen investor attitudes towards social media and drive many startups into the ground.
Business unusual
The fact that mainstream audiences are adopting new and innovational services is great and what many of us who have been working the web for over a decade have been waiting eagerly for - the only snag is how do we go about building new and sustainable businesses on this. Most current web services are positioned as ‘free’ which is great from a consumer perspective but leads to situation where web 2.0 businesses are not monetising their core assets (content, levels of user engagement, …). Obviously there are opportunities to charge for add-ons and exclusive content but it takes a long time and a huge audience before this makes sense. Other web services are ‘free’ but only until a point comes when they feel comfortable charging customers, this point being one of critical mass and concept being tested and proved - this is also a challenge with fear of drop out when charges are introduced. So clearly there is a need for for some new thinking here, thinking that addresses these challenges and also leverages the collective intelligence, openness and networks effects that are web 2.0.
Categories: Home · Opinion · Web